WHAT I THINK







The Sky Is Falling Again
(Climate Change Disaster Part One.)

July 11th, 2009

Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, is at it again.

Today She said if the Senate doesn't pass a bill to cut global warming, there will be dire results: droughts, floods, fires, loss of species, damage to agriculture, worsening air pollution and more.

Sounds a little like Chicken Little. Never do the Global Warming, now called the Climate Change nut cases, site any science. Why is that? Because there is no science that points to any climate disaster. Here we see all the proof they have. They run around screaming :

THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING, QUICK SEND US MONEY AND GIVE US POWER OVER EVERY PART OF YOUR LIVES OR THE WORLD WILl COME TO AN END.

But no credible science.

Ted Turner another brilliant climate change conspiricists, said in an Atlanta Journal-Constitution article published on April 3rd, 2008.

"Failure to address global warming will have us all dead or eating each other by mid-century." If steps aren't taken to stem global warming, "We'll be eight degrees hotter in 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow, Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals Civilization will have broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state - like Somalia or Sudan - and living conditions will be intolerable." That is if the temperature only rises 8 degrees. This is the kind of stupid rhetoric that is fueling the Democrats in Washington today. Even though there was a 255 page report submitted to Congress signed by over 650 real live scientist and climatologist stating that there is no Climate Change Disaster coming, and that it is all a hokes. Of course facts have no place in Washington today. Al Gore let slip the real purpose of those screaming the sky is falling. on July 7, 2009 in Oxford at the Smith School World Forum on Enterprise and the Environment, sponsored by the UK Times. He declared that the Congressional climate bill will help bring about "global governance." For those not paying attention I will repeat this:

the Congressional climate bill will help bring about "global governance."

"I bring you good news from the U.S." He goes on to say, "Just two weeks ago, the House of Representatives passed the Waxman-Markey climate bill very much a step in the right direction." World Governance is a step in the right direction? You see the Climate Change nut bags don't care about saving the planet they want to rule it.

Now good ole Al as a sophomore received a D in Natural Sciences 6 (Man's Place in Nature) and then got a C-plus in Natural Sciences 118 his senior year. Is this the man you are willing to bet your very lives on when it comes to complex scientific issues surrounding meteorology and climatology.

When John C. Davis, a retired teacher and assistant headmaster at St. Albans, was recently shown his illustrious former pupil's college board achievement test scores, he inspected them closely with a magnifier and shook his head, chuckling quietly at the science results. "Four eighty-eight! Terrible" Davis declared upon inspecting the former vice president's 488 score (out of a possible 800) in physics. "Hmmmm. Chemistry. Five-nineteen. He didn't do too well in chemistry." This is the man traveling the World lecturing us on important issues on climate change?

In SARITA, Texas on the Kennedy Ranch they tried to build 240 plus wind turbines. Now I would think that wind turbines would be right up their alley. But no, wind turbines will interfere with migratory birds' flight patterns, threaten other wildlife and create an eyesore even though the nearest highway is nearly 20 miles away. Interfere with migratory bird flight patterns? Like birds are too stupid to fly around wind turbines, and what other wildlife is going to be threatened. I can see it now, some badger standing up to a wind turbine and yelling, "are you talking to me, you threatening me." And they are worried about it being an eyesore. I guess people becoming cannibals because of an 8 degree increase in temperature is not an eyesore, if Ted Turner is to believed.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. a noted environmental attorney, is all for saving the planet, until the first-ever U.S. offshore wind farm, much like the turbines already lining Denmark and Sweden and planned for the British and Irish coasts, was going to be built in Nantucket Sound. It would be six miles off the coast of the Kennedy Compound. As well as the vistas of many expensive homes on Martha's Vineyard, and Cape Cod retreats. The plan by Cape Wind Associates envisions 130 wind turbines 40 stories tall, spreading over 24 square miles and clearly visible from the shore. I guess rich people are all for saving the planet, as long as it doesn't interfere with their view of the ocean. We need to stop listening to chicken little preachers on climate change and start listening to science. If we don't stop them this Country will not survive.

This issue will not be explained in one article so watch for more to come.



And that's what I think!

Phil Haikey